Do Press Release Backlinks Pass Authority?

Short answer: mostly no, and the ones that do are the ones you should worry about.

That's an uncomfortable thing for an agency that sells press release distribution to put in writing. But the alternative is letting clients buy something for a reason that doesn't hold, and that always ends in a hard conversation six months later when the rankings haven't moved.

So here's the full version: what Google's policy actually says, what happens to the link in practice, and the four things a press release does deliver that have nothing to do with link equity.

The policy, quoted properly

Google's spam policy document lists examples of link spam. Press releases are named there explicitly. The substance of the wording: advertorials or native advertising where payment is received for articles that include links passing ranking credit, or links with optimized anchor text in articles, guest posts, or press releases distributed on other sites.

Notice the two conditions joined together. Payment received, and links that pass ranking credit or carry optimized anchor text. Both parts matter.

Google has also been clear, in the same document, that buying and selling links is a normal part of the web's advertising economy and is not inherently a problem. What makes it a problem is undisclosed ranking credit.

Disclosure is `rel="sponsored"` or `rel="nofollow"`. Google introduced the sponsored attribute in September 2019 specifically for paid placements. Since then it has treated these attributes as hints rather than absolute directives, which is a technical distinction worth understanding but doesn't change the practical instruction: mark paid links.

So a paid press release with a plain follow link and a commercial anchor sits squarely in the category Google names. Not a grey area. Named, in the policy, with press releases spelled out.

What actually happens to the link

Three different things happen depending on the outlet, and understanding which one you're buying changes what you should expect.

The syndication problem, which nobody puts in the pitch

Wire distribution is sold on pickup count. Two hundred sites, four hundred sites, a thousand.

Here's what those numbers usually mean. One release goes out. Aggregators and partner sites reproduce it, often verbatim, often on templated pages with no editorial involvement. Many carry a canonical tag pointing back to the origin, which is the correct thing for them to do. Many are pages nobody will ever visit.

So a pickup count of 400 is not 400 backlinks in any meaningful sense. It's one piece of content on 400 URLs, most of them consolidating back to one.

That is not a reason to avoid wire distribution. It's a genuinely useful thing for reaching journalists and for making an announcement discoverable. It is a reason to stop reading pickup count as a link-building metric, because it isn't one.

What a press release does deliver

Four things, and all four are real. None of them is link equity.

Brand mention on domains with editorial history. Search engines and AI systems both read context. Your company name appearing in an established publication carries weight even when the link is marked sponsored, and even when there's no link at all. Unlinked citations count for more now than they did five years ago.

Control of the brand-name search result. When someone searches your company name, what they see is a set of pages. If several of those are coverage in recognised outlets rather than just your own site and a directory listing, that's a stronger position. It matters most when something unflattering needs pushing down.

Being available to be cited by AI systems. This is the value that has grown fastest and is measured least. ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini draw on sources they treat as reasonable, and a dated release from a real publisher with named figures is exactly the shape of thing they use. The nofollow attribute does not prevent an AI crawler from reading and citing the page. Worth repeating, because a lot of people assume it does.

Documentation. For procurement, funding rounds, partner due diligence, tender submissions. In regulated sectors this often matters more than everything above combined, and it's the reason press-council verification status is worth asking about per outlet.

How to buy it without pretending

If you accept that link equity isn't the product, the buying decision changes shape. It gets simpler, actually.

If your goal is	Optimise for	Ignore
Credibility for a tender or investor	Registered publishers, press-council status, named outlets	Pickup count, link attribute
Controlling brand-name results	A handful of high-authority outlets, brand-name anchors	Volume, exact-match commercial anchors
AI citation	Data in the release, named sources, clear dated claims	Follow attributes, outlet count
Reaching journalists	Wire distribution and a real news angle	Domain rating of the wire's partner network
Ranking a commercial keyword	Your own content and technical health	Press releases entirely. Wrong tool

That last row is the one that saves the most money. Press releases are not a ranking tactic. Treating them as one is how a budget gets spent with nothing to show.

What we changed in our own practice

Being specific here rather than generic, since it's the only part of this I can speak to directly.

We stopped promising link attributes across a list. It's stated per outlet now, because that's the only version that survives contact with the outlets' own policies. We also stopped counting syndicated pickups as placements in reporting, which made some numbers look smaller and made all of them mean something.

And when a campaign genuinely depends on link attribution, we say that at the briefing and filter the list to outlets that fit, rather than accepting the brief and hoping. That conversation is awkward once. The alternative is awkward every month.

The outlet-level data behind this sits in the Arfadia media directory, where link attribute, press-council status and domain rating are shown per outlet with the check date next to the data, and sites that accept paid articles but are not news publishers are separated into their own labelled tier.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do press release backlinks pass authority?

Usually not, and where they do it is often because the outlet has not followed Google's disclosure guidance. Google's spam policy names press releases explicitly: paid articles containing links that pass ranking credit, or links with optimized anchor text, count as link spam. Established publishers with an SEO team generally mark paid placements `rel="sponsored"`, which reduces ranking credit and is correct practice on their part.

Are press releases bad for SEO then?

They are not bad, they are the wrong tool for ranking commercial keywords. They deliver brand mention on domains with editorial history, control over brand-name search results, availability to be cited by AI systems, and documentation for procurement or investors. If the objective is ranking a commercial term, your own content and technical health do more per rupiah.

What does a pickup count of 400 actually mean?

Usually one release reproduced across 400 URLs, many of them templated aggregator pages with canonical tags pointing back to the origin. It is not 400 independent backlinks. Wire distribution remains useful for reaching journalists and making an announcement discoverable, but pickup count is not a link-building metric.

Does a nofollow link stop AI systems from citing the page?

No. The attribute is a signal to search crawlers about ranking credit. It does not prevent an AI crawler from reading the page or using it as a source in an answer. This is one reason press releases have become more valuable for AI visibility at the same time as their link value has fallen.

What anchor text should a press release link use?

Brand name or the plain URL. Exact-match commercial anchor text inside paid articles is named in Google's spam policy, and repeating the same commercial anchor across many syndicated copies produces the most recognisable pattern of all. For brand mention purposes the brand-name anchor is also more effective, because that is the string search and AI systems associate with the entity.

Should I ask for dofollow links in a press release campaign?

You can ask, but understand what you are asking for. A publisher that agrees across the board is either not applying Google's guidance or does not have an SEO function reading it. If a campaign genuinely depends on link attribution, say so at the briefing so the outlet list can be filtered to what actually fits, rather than discovering the mismatch afterwards.

How do I check whether a press release placement is still live?

Keep the published URL for every placement and re-check the list one quarter later. Some sites prune old content, and some sell article removal as a service, so a placement can disappear months after payment without notice. A link on a deleted page is worth nothing, and it is usually discovered during an audit long after the invoice cleared.

Does press-council verification affect the SEO value of a placement?

Not directly. Verification is about whether an independent body has examined the publisher, not about search signals. It matters for a different reason: in regulated sectors, public tenders and listed-company communications, verification status is the thing that gets asked for. Treat it as a separate column from domain rating, because the two answer different questions.

---

---