Have you ever wondered why a fast-food chain sold most of its milkshakes before 8:30 in the morning? Or why so many new products flop despite extensive market research? The answer lies in understanding what "job" customers are hiring a product to do. Traditional approaches based on demographics, features, and market sectors often miss the real story behind a customer's decision.
The Jobs to Be Done (JTBD) framework is reshaping how marketers think. Instead of making assumptions about customers based on who they are, it helps brands understand what customers are trying to accomplish. This shift from demographic profiles to the progress people seek changes everything from product innovation to campaign messaging.
A foundational belief of JTBD is that people don't simply buy products; they hire them to get a job done. Many new products fail because they don't address a real job customers need to get done, and those failures cost businesses enormous sums every year.
According to Strategyn, Tony Ulwick conceptualized the approach in 1990 by applying Six Sigma thinking to innovation. His firm describes its method in Strategyn's comprehensive framework and claims an 86% success rate for its Outcome-Driven Innovation process, compared with what it calls an industry average of roughly 17%; these are the firm's own figures. The idea reached a much wider audience when Harvard professor Clayton Christensen made it central to his work, which changed how many businesses think about customer needs.
What separates JTBD is a focus on the three dimensions of every job. There's the functional part first of all, what is there to be done? The second is the emotional dimension, which represents the way customers would like to feel. A third aspect is the social one, how do others perceive them. Businesses that comprehend all three dimensions devise solutions that register on more than one level.
So why does this matter so much for digital marketers right now?
The framework combines several connected elements to uncover customer motivations. At its core, JTBD recognizes that jobs don't change; products do. Consider communication: the job of "staying in touch with distant loved ones" has existed for millennia. The solutions moved from letters to telegrams to phones to video calls, but the underlying job never changed.
The ultimate measure is progress in JTBD thinking. Your market doesn't want your product; they want to make progress in their lives. This progress can be practical (moving from point A to B), psychological (feeling safe), or social (impressing colleagues). Knowing what kind of progress customers are looking for enables businesses to craft better solutions.
Context is extremely important in JTBD research. The same person may have different jobs in different situations. A busy parent needs a different meal solution on a Tuesday night than on a Sunday afternoon. Paying attention to these contextual elements reveals opportunities that demographic analysis would completely miss.
The framework also includes the idea of "hiring" and "firing" products. Customers adopt solutions when they do the job best. If a product doesn't help the user make progress, the user "fires" it and finds a replacement. This makes the hiring and firing decision more about how well the job gets done than about customer acquisition.
This has direct implications for online marketing campaigns.
The best-known JTBD case study is about milkshakes at a fast-food chain, often reported as McDonald's. Despite customer surveys and product tweaks based on feedback, milkshake sales did not improve. Then the researchers applied JTBD thinking and found something surprising.
As Harvard Business School Online recounts, most of the milkshakes were sold before 8:30 a.m. to commuters who were not buying them for taste or nutrition. They hired the milkshake to keep them from getting hungry or bored on a long drive to work. A thick shake lasted the whole ride and could be held while driving. The real competition was not other milkshakes but bananas, bagels, and snack bars.
Understanding this job pointed to practical changes, such as making shakes thicker so they last longer, adding bits of fruit for variety, or speeding up morning pickup. The insight wasn't about making a "better" milkshake; it was about doing the commute job better.
Despite offering solid benefits, Microsoft's licensing programs such as Software Assurance were not delivering the value customers expected. Customers did not see obvious value, and conventional analysis called for adding features or lowering the price.
JTBD research showed that customers weren't simply looking for software updates. They wanted to make IT budgets go further, reduce organizational risk, and minimize disruption during technology changes. These underlying jobs explained why feature improvements had failed to move the needle.
According to Strategyn, Microsoft used its Outcome-Driven Innovation approach to rebuild the offering around the outcomes IT professionals were trying to achieve, emphasizing predictable budgets and lower risk instead of features. Strategyn reports that in the year the revised offering was announced, Microsoft beat its revenue goal by more than 10%.
Project management software company Basecamp learned that customers rarely used the words "project management" to describe their problems. Through JTBD customer interviews with The Re-Wired Group, it found that customers were really trying to reduce communication chaos, get their teams on the same page, and see how work was progressing.
This insight changed its approach. Marketing messages shifted from feature lists to outcomes, and product development could resist feature creep by focusing on the jobs that really mattered. Basecamp's growth trajectory shows how companies that invest in understanding customer jobs set themselves up for better positioning and growth.
The problem with the classic innovation model is that it relies on guessing what customers want. Tony Ulwick's innovation process based on JTBD is designed to replace guesswork with measured customer outcomes; Strategyn reports an 86% success rate for it, against a roughly 17% industry average by its own estimate.
When brands stop guessing and start understanding real customer jobs, innovation becomes more predictable and less dependent on luck. Product teams know what to build because they know what progress customers want to make, and they know what success will look like.
The financial impact can be large. Failed products waste development, advertising, and opportunity costs. By raising success rates, companies can shift resources from likely failures to likely winners and grow more profitably. Many companies underestimate how much money they leave on the table.
Generic marketing speaks to nobody. JTBD sharpens messages by exposing the actual progress customers want to make. Instead of simple feature lists, brands can tell stories about how they help customers succeed.
Consider how Uber's messaging evolved. Early marketing centered on a "push a button, get a ride" idea that was entirely feature-centric. Later messaging moved toward the progress customers want, as in the tagline "Get there. Your day belongs to you." Job-focused messaging like this speaks to the freedom and control customers really want.
Messaging built around specific jobs tends to perform better than messaging about generic benefits, because prospects immediately see themselves in it. Test it against your current messaging to measure the difference for your own audience.
So why does this work so well?
Competing on features is a race to the bottom. Companies keep adding features and complexity, and customers get confused. JTBD breaks this cycle by revealing opportunities competitors have missed.
The circular saw market seemed saturated when Bosch looked at it, with every product competing on power, blade size, and cutting capacity. In a case described by Strategyn, Bosch used Outcome-Driven Innovation to uncover a hidden segment of tradesmen who struggled more than others to cut wood in a straight line, along with other jobs such as working safely and precisely on job sites. Bosch's market research was then turned into products built around those jobs.
By serving these underserved jobs, Bosch achieved differentiation without radical innovation. According to Strategyn, the resulting circular saw generated more initial interest and sales than any other product the company had created at the time. This kind of differentiation lasts because it is based on real customer requirements, not product features.
Conventional segmentation is based on demographics (age, income, education) or firmographics (company size, geography, industry). A city-based professional might look like one segment on paper, but JTBD shows they have different jobs at different times. On a Monday morning they need a quick, efficient meal; on Friday night they want social dining. Same person, different jobs, different solutions.
Job-based segmentation often predicts behavior better than demographics. If someone is trying to "appear successful at a client meeting," they may choose premium options regardless of their socioeconomic profile. This behavioral insight enables sharper targeting and customization.
Job-based segments often convert better than demographic segments, because they reach people when they actually have a job to be done, not just because they fit a profile. This changes how you should think about campaign timing.
Without JTBD, decisions often come down to politics and opinions, and the loudest or highest-paid person's view wins. JTBD offers clearer criteria for allocating resources: how important a job is and how poorly it is currently satisfied.
Related approaches such as those described in MIT research on design thinking also emphasize starting from real user needs. Prioritizing by job importance helps companies understand which opportunities matter most to customers and size market potential more accurately.
Opportunity scoring models help measure the potential of each job. They turn budget discussions from matters of opinion into evidence-based decisions, so resources go to the most impactful opportunities, which speeds up growth and reduces waste.
Success starts with proper setup. Build support from leadership by explaining where JTBD comes from and sharing industry-specific case studies. Estimate what it would mean for your business if fewer new products and campaigns failed, and make the business case concrete.
Next, assemble a cross-functional team. JTBD insights affect product, marketing, sales, and customer success, so make sure each function has a seat at the table. A small team, often six to eight people, is large enough for varied perspectives and small enough for quick decisions.
Articulate your market based on the job, not on the way things have always been. If you are solving the "stay entertained during my commute" job, your market isn't just your product category. It's also podcasts, games, the radio and the music in people's pockets. This broader perspective shows competition and prospects.
Set specific research goals and benchmarks for success. Which decisions exactly will JTBD insights guide? How will you measure impact? Bring these expectations to the table so that you remain clear about what you are looking for throughout the process.
JTBD research is not traditional market research. Instead of asking what features people want, it asks what progress people are trying to make. That calls for different methods and different questions.
Begin with "switch interviews" with customers who recently moved to a different solution. Switches offer the clearest view of jobs, because customers actively considered alternatives. Ask how they went from first thought to final choice. What triggered the search? What alternatives did they consider? Why did they choose your solution?
These conversations are all informed by the Forces of Progress framework. Four forces influence every job:
Record discoveries from interviews and observations in job stories, not user stories. To write them: "When [situation], I'm looking to [motivation], so I can [expected outcome]." The context, motivation, and success criteria are all present in this statement.
Map the customer journey through the Universal Job Map. All jobs cover the same stages: define, locate, prepare, confirm, execute, monitor, modify, conclude. Discovering where customers are pained exposes innovation opportunities.
Raw interview data must be analyzed systematically to produce specific recommendations. Start by listing all the outcomes customers mentioned. What does success look like for each job? Be concrete: "save time" is vague, but "finish my monthly reporting in 2 hours or less" is actionable.
Quantify the importance of and satisfaction with each outcome through a survey, using a simple scale: How important is this outcome? How well is it being met today? The gap between importance and satisfaction indicates the size of the opportunity.
Calculate opportunity scores as Importance + (Importance – Satisfaction), where the gap is not allowed to go below zero. This reveals underserved outcomes, which are the biggest opportunities. In Ulwick's approach, scores above roughly 12 are generally treated as strong opportunities.
Segment customers by the jobs they are trying to get done. Unlike population-based segments, job-based segments have distinct needs. Someone whose job is "minimize audit risk" will act very differently from someone whose job is "maximize team productivity," regardless of company size or industry.
Turn concepts into strategy. Begin by analyzing the competitive landscape from a jobs perspective. Who else aids customers with these jobs? Direct competitors, indirect substitutes, workarounds, etc. You may find out that your real competition is not who you think.
Create a portfolio of strategic options. Which underserved outcomes can you address? Where can you do a much better job? You may find a sizable number of opportunities; prioritize them by market size, competitive advantage, and synergies.
Develop a logical order for the order of your initiatives. Begin with some quick wins that prove the approach then move towards some big bets that are transformational. Every initiative should be explicit about what job it gets done and how you'll measure success.
Organize around jobs rather than features. Update personas with jobs and outcomes. Shift development priorities toward getting jobs done rather than adding features. Train sales teams to talk about jobs, not products. This organizational alignment strengthens your JTBD strategy.
A common mistake is framing jobs as solutions. "I need a faster computer" is not a job; it's a solution to an unstated job such as "run data analysis without waiting" or "impress clients with fast slide generation." This confusion leads to incremental innovation instead of breakthrough innovation.
Teach your staff to inquire further about solutions when customers talk about them. Ask "What differences do you want to make?" and "How to measure success?" These questions reveal true jobs. Practice turning solution statements into job statements until it rolls off the tongue.
A simple test helps: Are there multiple possible solutions for this need? If yes, you have found a job. If not, you are still thinking in terms of solutions. Use this test consistently to reduce solution bias.
Functional jobs are the simplest to spot so that's where teams usually stop. But many purchase decisions are driven by their emotional or social jobs, particularly in consumer markets. If you miss out on those dimensions, you're missing out on some big opportunities.
The functional job of a luxury car may be transportation, but the emotional job of "feeling successful" and the social job of "impressing colleagues" explain why buyers pay a premium. Work such as this Stanford business research explores how emotional connection shapes customer relationships, and emotional jobs can matter as much as functional ones for differentiation.
Include emotional and social job questions in every interview. How do you want to feel? What do others think? These questions can feel awkward at first, but they are illuminating, and emotional jobs often explain customer behavior that otherwise seems irrational.
Job definition requires balance. "Be happy" is just too general to do anything with. "Cut a piece of 2x4 at a 45-degree angle" isn't a broad enough prompt to generate ingenuity. Good jobs lie somewhere in between.
Good jobs are narrow enough to direct effort, yet broad enough to take many forms. Check your job statements with this question: Could this job be done in ways that are substantially different? If not, narrow it. Could wildly varied products cover this job? If yes, specify it further.
The "ladder of abstraction" helps. Start with a customer statement and ask "why" to move up toward higher-level jobs, and ask "how" to move down toward possible solutions. The right level is usually a couple of rungs from the original statement.
JTBD insights come from depth, not breadth. One deep interview can reveal more than many shallow surveys. Yet teams often skimp on research, cutting corners and missing the subtleties that separate great products from duds.
JTBD interviews often run around an hour or longer and cover the whole journey from first thought to job done. That may seem long compared with a typical short market research call, but depth is crucial. Customers rarely state their jobs explicitly; jobs emerge through careful questioning and storytelling.
Practitioners often recommend interviewing around 15 to 20 people for a major job. That gives enough variety to spot patterns while avoiding false patterns from very small samples. It is a real time investment, but far cheaper than building products based on a misread market.
Qualitative interviews uncover jobs, but quantitative validation confirms market potential. Teams often skip this step and assume the problems they heard in interviews represent the broader market, which can lead to niche solutions being built for a mass market.
Once you have identified jobs through interviews, survey a larger sample to measure how common each job is and how important its outcomes are. A sample of a few hundred respondents is common for this kind of survey. Validation helps you avoid over-investing in jobs that sounded important to the internal team but affect few customers.
Quantitative validation also sizes opportunities. A job can be extremely important to the customers who have it, but if only a small share of customers experience it, the market potential is limited. A moderately important job that affects most customers may be a bigger opportunity. Numbers matter for strategic decisions.
JTBD isn't a replacement for your existing tools; it makes them more effective. Your CRM, analytics, automation, and personalization tools work better when they're organized around jobs rather than demographics.
Start with your analytics setup. You can create custom events that capture job oriented behaviors. Go beyond measuring "page views" and "conversions" to measuring "job discovery moments" and "job completion indicators." This transition exposes the content and features that are actually going to move customers forward.
Google Analytics 4 lets you track custom events and parameters, which you can use to capture job types, progress stages, and completed outcomes. This shifts analytics from vanity metrics toward progress metrics that help forecast which customers will succeed.
Marketing automation becomes much more precise when it is built around jobs. Instead of one-size-fits-all nurture tracks based on industry or role, consider job-specific journeys. Someone trying to "mitigate compliance risk" needs different content than someone looking to "shorten time to market," even if both have similar roles.
Traditional CRM systems should include additional fields attached to job information. What work does this client have to do? What outcomes matter most? Are they happy with the solutions they're using now? This dynamic changes sales conversations from product presentations to collaborative partnerships.
Personalization engines powered by job data can be very effective. Content recommendations that match a customer's current job tend to engage better than recommendations based only on historical activity, because past purchases reflect past jobs rather than today's needs.
The JTBD framework is evolving as new technologies make deeper insights possible at larger scale. Gartner's marketing research tracks how marketers are adopting generative AI, and customer insight generation is one of the most promising uses.
AI brings a new twist to interview analysis. Natural language processing can help researchers spot job patterns across hundreds of conversations much faster than manual coding, and machine learning can cluster similar jobs and outcomes to reveal segments human analysts might miss, as long as researchers still validate the results.
Predictive modeling of job data can support proactive innovation. By monitoring how jobs evolve, AI may help spot emerging jobs before they go mainstream, so companies can prepare solutions before demand is clearly articulated.
Real-time job identification using behavioral analytics is also taking shape. Instead of occasional research studies, ongoing insight into what customers are doing shows which jobs are changing and what new opportunities are emerging, which keeps tactics relevant in fast-moving markets.
Connect with voice of customer solutions to scale JTBD understanding. Job info is everywhere in customer interactions: in support tickets, reviews, social media. AI allows these signals to be extracted and synthesized into actionable insights and makes customer understanding universal across the organization.
Combining JTBD thinking with AI points to even more significant innovation, such as personalization engines that anticipate jobs before customers put them into words, or platforms that suggest solution ideas based on underserved outcomes.
First insights often appear within weeks of starting customer research. Quick wins, such as better messaging or a specific feature, can follow within a few months, while a full transformation of product development and market positioning usually takes longer. The timeline depends on the size of the organization and its commitment: smaller, nimble teams tend to show progress faster, while larger companies depend more on change management.
Absolutely. B2B applications of JTBD can be even more revealing, because business purchases involve several people whose jobs differ. Buying groups often include many stakeholders, as Forrester's B2B research on the state of B2B buying shows. Each person has functional jobs (making work easier), emotional jobs (feeling secure), and social jobs (looking good to colleagues). Understanding these different roles explains complex B2B purchase behavior better than traditional approaches.
Quality JTBD research is a real investment, but it is within reach of most companies. Costs depend on how many jobs you study, how many interviews and survey responses you need, and whether you work with an outside partner, so get quotes for your specific scope. Compared with the cost of a failed product, which can run into millions in development and marketing, the return is easy to see. Smaller businesses can start with the single highest-impact job.
Success metrics should map directly to business outcomes. Common metrics include innovation success rate, customer satisfaction with how well the job gets done, market share within job-defined segments, and financial metrics such as revenue per customer and customer lifetime value. Establish baseline measurements before implementation and track progress regularly, for example quarterly.
Don't ditch your existing assets; bring them to life with job insights. Conventional personas offer helpful context, and layering jobs on top makes them actionable. Add the main jobs each persona needs to do, how they measure success, and the situations that trigger the job. This turns static profiles into dynamic predictors of behavior. Job-based segments can also be layered onto existing segmentation to improve targeting.
Customers rarely state their jobs directly, which is why specific interview techniques matter. Instead of asking "What job are you trying to do?", explore their journey through storytelling. "Tell me about the last time you looked for a solution like ours" uncovers jobs through stories. Focus on points of friction, switching between solutions, and the workarounds they have created. These clues are far more reliable than direct questions.
JTBD is very good at surfacing radical innovation opportunities. Jobs predate solutions: people stayed in touch before there were phones, preserved memories before cameras, and found their way without GPS. For new categories, focus on the progress people want but have been unable to achieve. What workarounds do they use? What do they leave undone? Tesla's master plan from 2006 set out to make electric cars desirable and help move the world toward sustainable energy, serving buyers who wanted a car that was exciting to drive without the environmental cost. The job was there; the tool was not.
The JTBD Framework offers a new way to see your customers. When businesses understand the progress people are trying to make rather than just the products they use, they uncover innovation opportunities that traditional market research misses, and they build stronger customer relationships along the way.
JTBD thinking can improve digital marketing across the board, from search optimization that targets job-based searches to content focused on specific customer outcomes. It takes marketers beyond demographic guesswork toward customers' real motivations.
Starting your JTBD journey doesn't require massive investment or organizational upheaval. Start with just one important customer segment and one crucial job. Utilize the interviewing strategies and evaluation approaches described here. Try out job-focused messaging in a single campaign. Generate evidence for wider roll-out from small wins.
The companies winning today understand that sustainable advantage comes from serving customers' jobs better than the alternatives, not from features or technology alone. As customers become more discerning, this insight matters more. Businesses that embrace JTBD thinking will be well placed, while those that cling to demographics and feature wars will find it harder to stay relevant.
Are you ready to change the way you know your customers? The future belongs to companies that solve jobs not build products.
We use cookies to ensure the website runs optimally and to help us understand how you use our services. You can choose which categories to allow. Read our Privacy Policy.
Required for basic website functionality. Cannot be disabled.
Help us understand how visitors interact with the website. Data used anonymously.
Used to display relevant ads and measure campaign effectiveness.
Enables live chat, social media integrations, and language preferences.